Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
datatrak:signal [2020/05/31 17:31] – [Nav slots] philpemdatatrak:signal [2024/02/21 14:54] (current) – [Operating frequencies] philpem
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Datatrak signal -- technical details ======+====== Signal format -- technical details ======
  
 At the top level, the Datatrak signal consists of //sync data// and a series of time-multiplexed //navigation slots//. Each transmitter is assigned one or more //slots//, which are either //master slots// (the transmitter generates the slot without a reference) or //slave slots// (synchronised to a master slot). At the top level, the Datatrak signal consists of //sync data// and a series of time-multiplexed //navigation slots//. Each transmitter is assigned one or more //slots//, which are either //master slots// (the transmitter generates the slot without a reference) or //slave slots// (synchronised to a master slot).
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 These are the centre frequencies of the two channels used by the UK system. These are the centre frequencies of the two channels used by the UK system.
 +
 +==== Current situation ====
 +
 +Were a system like Datatrak to be implemented, its operation would be subject to the [[https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/reg/R-REG-RR-2020-ZIP-E.zip|ITU Radio Regulations]]. The LF radionavigation allocation closest to Datatrak would be from 70 kHz to 130 kHz.
 +
 +The old Datatrak frequencies are currently part of a fixed/maritime mobile allocation without radionavigation specified. Whether this could be re-used is a question better posed to the ITU or a national regulator!
  
  
Find me on Mastodon
  • Last modified: 2020/05/31 17:31
  • by philpem